|Title:||Transparency, Recognition, and Innovation in Peer Review in the Life Sciences|
|Creator:||Vale, Ron [Chair]; et al.|
|Publisher:||ASAPbio = Accelerating Science and Publication in Biology|
|Abstract:||This meeting will convene thought-leaders from the scientific community, publishers, technology developers, and funding agencies to discuss topics including: Should journal peer review become a transparent and citable form of scholarly communication? Should scientists receive credit for peer review and, if so, how might this be achieved?
What are best practices in peer review, how can they be spread? How can we train scientists in scholarly review? Is it possible to overcome inefficiencies and redundancies in peer review? Should reviewers be expected to review supporting datasets and code? Using new tools (e.g. preprints and the internet), are there new models for feedback/evaluation that could augment traditional peer review?
[Information of the supplier];
» find similar sources!
|Conferences and Congresses (current)|
|Metadata update date:||Dec 15, 2017 12:28:58 PM|
|URL of this vifabio-resource:||http://www.vifabio.de/en/iqfBio/detail/9498|
|© Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Biologie (vifabio)|